Civil Liberties Groups Hail Supreme Court GPS Decision - youngtwored

The U.S. Supreme Court has compulsive that warrants must be obtained ahead the government rump attach a GPS tracking twist to a drive vehicle–and this decision is being hailed equally a victory for individual rights by civil liberties groups.

"This decision is significant victory for privacy," ACLU Staff Attorney Catherine Crump told PCWorld. "This [decisiveness] is a good reason to be optimistic that the Court will update our agreement of the Fourth Amendment to keep step with new technologies."

"IT is novel because it is one of the low gear decisions to ray-in on how the digital revolution is passing to sham our privacy rights," Crump added.

In the case, U.S. v. Jones, the Supreme Court unanimously found that the US Government violated the ordinal amendment rights of Antoine Jones when it placed a GPS tracking twist on his car without his knowledge. The fourth amendment protects citizens from unlogical search and seizures by the government.

Although the case focussed on attaching a Global Positioning System tracking device to a motorial vehicle, the implications of the case run along beyond these narrow boundaries.

"A majority of the justices recognize that new technologies come through possible to collect increasingly information nearly Americans than always ahead," Crump said. "And [the Supreme Court justices] seem poised to manage with other forms of invasive tracking in the future."

One so much strong-growing technology is cell phone triangulation.

"Cell phone triangulation can be even as precise Eastern Samoa GPS," Gregory T. Nojeim, conductor of the Center for Democracy & Applied science's Project along Freedom, Security system and Technology says in a statement.

Because the Court's legal age opinion didn't address the cellular telephone phone come out, Nojeim called for a general assembly resolution to the job.

"Congress should build on this judgment aside writing a statute that draws a lucent line requiring the government, except in emergencies, to obtain a warrantee before turning your cell phone into a tracking device," Nojeim aforementioned.

There is support among the justices for Congressional action in that expanse, accordant to Hanni Fakhoury, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

"At to the lowest degree five justices said Congress necessarily to step in and should determine this character of thing if they're really troubled by it, just as they did with wiretaps," Fakhoury told PCWorld .

Today's court conclusion happening GPS tracking devices also received congratulations from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which is currently involved in a case involving a Santa Clara, California resident who discovered a Global Positioning System trailing device settled on his fomite in October 2022. FBI agents went to his location deuce days after the GPS device was ascertained to retrieve it and interrogate him.

"We welcome this decision because information technology clearly shows that the nation's highest court has recognized that the warrantless use of GPS devices is a violation of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure," CAIR Legal Guidance Nadhira Al-Khalili, who filed a "friends of the court" brief in the suit for the council, said in a statement.

Keep an eye on freelance technology author John P. Mello Jr. and Today@PCWorld on Twitter.